Contact Information:
Assistant Editor
Mary K. Aaby

E-mail: RFM@kent.edu
Telephone: 330.672.2432
Fax: 330.672.9806

Mail:
RFM
College of Business Administration
Kent State University
P.O. Box 5190
Kent, Ohio 44242-0001



Call for Papers
20th Annual APFRS

Deadline Nov 1, 2009
  More Information


In cooperation with
IFM LOGO

Review of Futures Markets

Volume 17 | Issue 1 | Article 1

Next Article >>
Back To: Table of Contents

Hedging "Event" Risk
Philip McBride Johnson

On May 1, 2008, the same day when Soviet tanks used to rumble through Red Square, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced that it will consider whether instruments that are related to the outcome of events such as elections, sporting contests or population growth should be blessed with its regulatory approval or should be branded as gaming contracts. Of course, nearly all of the existing “futures contracts” and “commodity options” within the CFTC’s remit involve patronage by large numbers of speculators, so the mere assumption of a foreign risk by people who could readily avoid it cannot be, in itself, a disqualification. Presumably, the outcome will hinge on whether any economic benefit inures from these instruments other than the thrill of the wager.