Contact Information:
Assistant Editor
Mary K. Aaby

E-mail: RFM@kent.edu
Telephone: 330.672.2432
Fax: 330.672.9806

Mail:
RFM
College of Business Administration
Kent State University
P.O. Box 5190
Kent, Ohio 44242-0001



Call for Papers
20th Annual APFRS

Deadline Nov 1, 2009
  More Information


In cooperation with
IFM LOGO

Review of Futures Markets

Volume 15 | Issue 3 | Article 1

Next Article >>
Back To: Table of Contents

Multi-Market Trading of Gold Futures
Valeria Martinez and Yiuman Tse (G13, G14)

On October 4, 2004, the Chicago Board of Trade introduced the electronic full-size gold futures contract that complements the CBOT’s established mini-size electronic gold futures contract and is in direct competition to the New York Mercantile Exchange’s COMEX full-size gold futures contract, which is sold mainly through open outcry. Although the COMEX contract initially provides better market quality for the trading of gold futures contracts, over the 22-month period of our study the favorable market quality conditions transfer to the CBOT full-size contract. We find price discovery migration is influenced by market share and transaction costs. By August 2006, the CBOT full-size contract has the highest volume, the lowest effective spread, and contributes the most to price discovery. Investors in the gold futures market prefer to trade full-size contracts electronically.